User talk:JLRedperson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, JLRedperson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RayTalk 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of HP IT Management Software[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on HP IT Management Software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


Hello, I completely rewrote the article citing numerous sources, listing only product names and being objective. This article is no less biased than Microsoft Office article or IBM articles. I want to conform to all WIkipedia guidelines so please let me know if there is more I can do to improve the article. JLRedperson (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

HP Software & Solutions link to Software Top 100[edit]

JLRedperson, congratulations on the work on the HP_Software_&_Solutions page. You may or may not have noticed that the link you put on the page to Software Top 100 to indicate the company size of HP Software, was deleted by user Esoteric Rogue on January 30. He deletes all links from Wikipedia to Software Top 100. Despite the fact the source is under discussion, he deletes it (without providing a better alternative) mentioning it is not WP:RS. Would you please join the discussion on my talk page? Thanks! --BalderV (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Hello JLRedperson. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

User:JLRedperson/HP Business Service Automation[edit]

Hi JLRedperson

I have moved the page JLRedperson/HP Business Service Automation to your user subpage User:JLRedperson/HP Business Service Automation. Remember to use User: as a prefix to your user subpage. happy editing. --Visik (talk) 05:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

WebOS[edit]

I have moved the following comment from your user page, as it obviously belongs here. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to the webOS page. I do not claim to be a Wikipedia expert, or to have the final word about matters of content, and I do appreciate your interest and skill set. However, I suggest that the item you added is perhaps more akin to advertising than relevant encyclopedic content. One aspect (among several that need not be spelled out in detail) of this feedback to you is that some responses on the website you cited suggest that this is a paying attendee event pitched to enterprise customers, and not meeting for webOS developers/development, which is the section topic. If you feel I am being unduly harsh, add back your material.FeatherPluma (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)