User talk:JTommyZ

Welcome![edit]

Hi JTommyZ! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! NemesisAT (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please talk first[edit]

Please improve the article by visiting all references I already post here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jellywings19 (open the revisions history). You always revert all of my edits, even on someone's talkpage.--Jellylovers (talk) 12:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Alternate Mako said about Balikpapan. I edited the airport of Balikpapan, so I mention about Balikpapan. Then, what is the problem here? Can you help me, because nobody understand it.--Jellylovers (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellylovers please add only if there is sourced available if it is true. Do NOT edit it without proper soured or it can be simply reverted. JTommyZ (talk) 13:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JTommyZ What you are replying should be directed to yourself. I already provide reliable references, using official airline website (sriwijayaair.co.id) and Flightradar24, you already see it on Sockpuppetry page.

You do not cite any references at all here, instead using only Original Research in your edit summary.

Let other users decide who is the sockpuppet later.--Jellylovers (talk) 14:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellylovers you should be the one who add the proper source to articles. I only monitor it. JTommyZ (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to be involved in Edit Warring, and I do not need to, because other users can open all of my references easily, and return the article to the reliable revision. Other users do not believe any Original Research

And something strange here, are you related with User:The Alternate Mako. Because, you always taking care of his/her talkpage. --Jellylovers (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]