User talk:Jahreninenzo

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahreninenzo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I would like to request that my account be unblocked. I do understand the mistakes I've made, which is totally unintentional. My purpose is to mainly share information, not to spam or spread false information. I'm also not aware of the guidelines in editing since it's my first time to do it. If ever my request would be granted, I will not attempt to do the same thing again. I'm looking forward to your kind consideration. Jahreninenzo (talk) 02:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say your intention was not to spam, but that's exactly what you did. Wikipedia is not for merely sharing information, but for summarizing what independent reliable sources say about a topic. You'll need to describe any connection you have to the website that you were spamming, and tell us what edits you will make now that you know that will not be permitted. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahreninenzo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely understand your concerns and take full responsibility. Our non-profit project, BioDB, strives to provide accurate and reliable information about different species, mainly on the crucial aspect of the diminishing distribution of wildlife (due to habitat loss and fragmentation), which we take pride in and this is what we’ve tried to add to Wikipedia. We have a team of zoologists/ecologists compiling this data (we have references for everything). Should you kindly unblock us, we will always follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. We take it very seriously.

Decline reason:

"Our non-profit project", "we take pride", "we’ve tried to add", "We have a team", "we have references", "we will always follow", "We take it very seriously."

We have a policy that user accounts may not be shared. Cabayi (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.