User talk:Jai Hoec
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Jai Hoec! I noticed your contributions to Curriculum guideline (Japan) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 03:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Problem solving, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I've had to undo several of your edits. Your are making small edits to wording that sometimes significantly change the meanings of the sentences, or actually introduce grammar errors. For example, "the changeable emotions of individuals" is not the same as "the different kinds of emotions of individuals". And in Learning styles, you changed "there is ample evidence" to the incorrect "there is an ample of evidence". Meters (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be rude, but literally all of your contributions so far have been minor tweaks in wording that add either nothing or actively make the diction worse. Please provide a reason why you think your changes improve the article in the edit summary going forward. Remsense ‥ 论 06:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)