User talk:Jan Roseboom

See also the dutch wikipedia on Paul Belien.

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Omar Mateen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I contributed on == Mateen == and on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting two sources. I advise you to look at and be seriously

A.

An unnamed man, who claims he was gunman's lover told Univision Noticias : 'Orlando massacre was "revenge," not terrorism ' .

B

Transcript of interview Univision Noticias with man who claims to be former lover of Orlando gunman was gunman's lover . 

And more-over you denies/ rejects this sources : http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/pulse-orlando-nightclub-shooting/omar-mateen/os-omar-mateen-lover-talks-20160622-story.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/22/omar-mateens-gay-lover-claims-orlando-shooting-was-revenge-again/ http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/orlando-gunman-omar-mateen-gay-8267489 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/pulse-shooter-omar-mateen-revenge-alleged-ex-lover-article-1.2682856

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oath of Maimonides has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oath of Maimonides was changed by Jan Roseboom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95167 on 2017-03-25T06:34:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)