User talk:Janos Kurko
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Foreign names for towns
[edit]Why have you been removing non-Romanian names for towns? This is useful encyclopaedic information. JMiall₰ 12:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The next time you remove information from articles such as Focşani without even engaging in a discussion about it, you will be reported. You already risk being blocked. Dahn (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Palinka. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dahn (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Palinka
[edit]Dear Janos,
on the Talk:Palinka page, under section Hungarian and Romanian, User:Korossyl stated some very good reasons why the Hungarian name of Palinka should be first and Romanian second. As you obviously disagree I kindly ask you to write your reasons to the discussion page. This revert war is not good for anyone, nor the Wikipedia, we should find a consensus. Regards, Hu:Totya (talk!) 09:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
PLEASE write on the Palinka talk page to justify your changes to the article! The article can only be improved by a well-meaning debate between all parties and perspectives, but to just keep making changes and reverts over and over again with no justification borders on vandalism. Please either communicate with other editors somehow, whether here, on other talk pages (User_talk:Korossyl, for instance), or on Talk:Palinka itself. Korossyl (talk) 21:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your constant and annoying edits placing the Romanian first. Let me add this: at the risk of sounding prejudiced, I have to tell you that this behavior seems quaintly ridiculous to a lot of us here in the West, and leads to the conclusion, rolling one's eyes and throwing one's hands in the air, "What's wrong with those people?". I mean, it seems that no slight, no injustice, whether it happened last year or a thousand years ago, is too small not to go to war with people of some other ethnicity or across some border, as is evident here in your spat with those who, correctly it seems, want to place the Hungarian word first, as this is primarily a Hungarian name. So cut it out. +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Reported
[edit]I have reported you here. Have a good day. Dahn (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]You have been edit-warring stubbornly and against consensus of many editors on a large number of pages, without pursuing constructive dispute resolution. Following this arbitration ruling, I am putting you on notice that you may be banned from all articles related to this conflict, or fully blocked for longer periods, if you continue in this disruptive behaviour. For now, I have blocked you 24 hours for revert-warring. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- As you have continued in exactly the same way, I have blocked you again, for a week this time. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)