Jump to content

User talk:JaxChix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JaxChix, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JaxChix! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[edit]

When you are citing a sentence, please don't spam it with large numbers of references. On the sentence you added, there are 13 citations -- way overkill. For any one sentence, one reference is sufficient most of the time. Two to three citations is enough for almost every claim. From the guideline:

  • Two or three may be preferred for more controversial material or as a way of preventing linkrot for online sources, but more than three should generally be avoided; if four or more are needed, consider bundling (merging) the citations.

I would suggest finding the best three sources for the sentence and removing the rest. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenuity Thank you for your opinion - the reason that it has such a large number of citations is because the article notes "significant worldwide coverage", which means that the number of citations need to justify the adjective "significant" -- which previous editors to other articles have directed to mean multiple sources... had I used two or three (as you recommend) another editor would have come and deleted "significant" and noted that 2-3 references is not significant (as has happened in other articles)... and "worldwide" which would required sources(s) from around the globe, not just US. --JaxChix (talk) 15:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]