User talk:JayJasper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Community decision regarding your block[edit]

I imagine that you were following the discussion at the incident noticeboard, but someone suggested you ought to be notified here regarding the results of what you asked for. For reference, I've closed the discussion regarding your request as follows: Consensus is that an appeal will be permitted, provided that there is no block evasion. There is no consensus whether the block should be considered a ban, but this difference is largely academic—no administrator is likely to unblock JayJasper absent a clear community consensus to do so. JayJasper may appeal no less than six months from today; any appeal should be brought before the community for determination. There is clear consensus that a clean start should not be permitted under any circumstances. As I imagine you are well aware, you've seriously breached the trust of the community, and that is not regained quickly or easily. You also were clearly highly regarded as an editor prior to this. The community's consensus was that if you choose to return, you'll need to request to do so under this account, with full knowledge of who you are and what you did. Rebuilding trust like that takes time. I hope it goes without saying that use of any sockpuppets for block evasion could permanently destroy any hope of doing so. Rather, I'd encourage you to take the time off to consider what happened and how you might work toward correcting it upon any possible return. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

The notification is appreciated, and I find the community's decision to be more than fair. Message heard, loud and clear. I will comply fully with the terms of this decision, and will indeed use the time off as recommended, and work towards making amends should I have the good fortune to be given the chance to do so by the community at the appropriate time.--JayJasper (talk) 18:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 19[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library


Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

  • New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
  • New Library Card Platform and Conference news
  • Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, JayJasper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library


Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

  • Partner resource expansions
  • New search tool for finding TWL resources
  • #1lib1ref 2017
  • Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 10[edit]

WikiProject X icon.svg
Issue 10 of the WikiProject X newsletter is here!

This month, we discuss the new CollaborationKit extension. Here's an image as a teaser:

CollaborationKit screenshot CreateCollaborationHub.png

23:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)