Jump to content

User talk:Jay Phoenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Phoenixhead.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Phoenixhead.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Battle of the Bone[edit]

A tag has been placed on Battle of the Bone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 12:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis[edit]

I've removed the synopsis section of Battle of the Bone as a copyvio from http://www.battleofthebone.com/
Even without the copyvio concerns, it still wouldn't be appropriate for an encyclopedia article as it reads entirely too much like an advertisement for the movie. To establish notability, you need to provide information from independent sources that discuss the film. --OnoremDil 16:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may have made a mistake as I replied at your own talk page rather than here, apologies! As stated there is no copyright infringment as I am updating this page with permission and actually OWN the battle of the bone domain/website so am well aware that the details are being taken from there. I don't think that calling it an advertisment is fair, it is simply a work in progress. I am not intending to leave the page as it but update it will full information, where possible. Jay Jay Phoenix (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Copyright Yellow Fever Productions. All rights reserved." - That's what it says at the bottom of the page. And like I said, even without the copyvio concerns, it still doesn't belong. Just because it's the blurb you're using to advertise doesn't mean that it belongs on Wikipedia. We aren't here to advertise your movie. --OnoremDil 16:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I am pretty new at this but SURELY giving information used about the movie is and isn't (at the same time) classed as advertising? I have looked at the sites for other movies and found similar information there ... as I said, though, this page is a work in progress and will be updated will as much valid information about the production and making of the movie as possible - I am spending more time on this one small section than anything else though. As for copyright of yellow fever productions that IS George Clarke, the same guy who wrote the movie and the same guy who I did the site for! :o) Jay Jay Phoenix (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding it for now. You'll have to establish that it is yours to release and then change the copyright tag or it will not be considered acceptable. Also, please be aware of the 3 revert rule which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period or they will be blocked. --OnoremDil 16:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia[edit]

If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published (especially online), and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work, while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. It is sufficient to either:

  • Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

--OnoremDil 16:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, Jay Phoenix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Nomination of Battle of the Bone for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of the Bone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Bone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]