User talk:Jbass3586

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Vulfpeck, Jbass3586!

Wikipedia editor Binko71100 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Article is an orphan, but that doesn't matter much. Thanks for the contribution!

To reply, leave a comment on Binko71100's talk page.

Deletion discussion about Mit Peck

Hello, Jbass3586,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mit Peck should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mit Peck .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, User226 (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vulfpeck

The article Vulfpeck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Y not? 20:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And also Vollmilch has been similarly nominated. -- Y not? 20:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated both for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulfpeck -- Y not? 18:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mit-Peck-Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mit-Peck-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vollmilch cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vollmilch cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vulfpeck infobox image

Hi JBass, About the image you added to the Vulfpeck infobox, it is a non-free image. I am not 100% sure, but I am pretty confident that its use in the article violates this guideline WP:NFCI item #1, and WP:NFC#UUI item #1 (#2 and #3 show similar restrictions). I uploaded this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vulfpeck-at-rockwood-october-4-2013.jpg. It is the only decent (encyclopedic), free and licensed image that I could find. I plan to replace the current image with this one, and thought to drop you a note in advance. If you reply, please do so here on your talk page, I will be watching it. There were no decent (encyclopedic) free and licensed images that show all the four band members, so I figure 2 is better than none. Bammesk (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC) By the way I do like the image that you uploaded. It is probably a better representation of the band :) Bammesk (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was basing it off Lake Street Dive. JBass

I think lake street fails the guideline too, for the same reasons. Their non-free use rational is for their album article. For band articles there are the guidelines above, also note#1 and item#1. In both cases, lake street and vulfpeck, free licensed images (free equivalents) either exist or can be created. Bammesk (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vulfpeck-mitpeck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vulfpeck-mitpeck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of songs with rhythmic train samples

The article List of songs with rhythmic train samples has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No point having a list with only one item in it, and it seems an arbitrary thing to create a list of

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Smjg (talk) 12:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of songs with rhythmic train samples for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs with rhythmic train samples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with rhythmic train samples until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]