User talk:Jcabalo

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Code talker. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Code talker

This is an Encyclopedia, we do not do "According to this myth", "would have been" or "but no evidence has been found". Please stop ! your edits to this article are not improvements. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime:Very sorry about that, but really do not understand your comment. The present data about Basque Code Talkers in the article have been recently demonstrated as a myth (please, see the links I attached) and I am trying to include the references about it, as well as include those expresions on the previous data to emphasyze that form part of a refuted story. Please, read it carefully, specially the first and final paragraphs, and I am sure that you will understand what I pretend. Which should be your solution to obtain your OK?

I don't have to re-read it, your wording is not Encyclopedic, if something has to be described with the phrases you're using, then those descriptions have no place in an Encyclopedia. I am not questioning the validity of the information you're trying to include, just the way you're wording it. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Thank you, I Will try to improve my writing. The problem is to keep the refuted data (relevants for readers) without those expresions, but I'll rethink about It. Thanks for your time and your job for Wikipedia.

Jcabalo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jcabalo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Code talker. - FlightTime (open channel) 11:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Hi there. What do you mean with "unsourced material"? I have added 4 links to the sources:

Original story: ^[1] New study: ^[2] Fighting Basques project: ^[3] Reference about main hypothesis of the origin of the refuted history: ^[2]^[4].

Have I made some mistake with those sources? Should I use another format? Is there any problem for being in Spanish?

Thanks for your time and patience.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Code talker, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Once again, thanks for your time and guidance. Now, returning yo the "unsourced material", could you explain me what do you think it's wrong? I have added 4 sources in my edition, so, I don't understand what do you mean with "unsourced material". Thanks for all and sorry about my inexperience in Wikipedia edition.Jcabalo (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That should all be explained at some point in your discussion. Good luck, - FlightTime (open channel) 15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ . Euzko Deya – Mexico D.F. edition http://urazandi.euskaletxeak.net/vol1/dvd08/htm/port2.htm. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
^ ^a ^b Pedro J. Oiarzabal and Guillermo Tabernilla (2017). "El enigma del mito y la historia: Basque Code Talkers en la Segunda Guerra Mundial'". Saibigain.
^ "Fighting Basques, proyecto de memoria de la Asociación Sancho de Beurko".
^ "Un estudio desmiente que el euskera se usara en código en la Segunda Guerra Mundial". diariovasco.com.

[En_Euzkera_se_dio_la_orden_del_desembarco_de_Guadalcanal-1] . Euzko Deya – Mexico D.F. edition http://urazandi.euskaletxeak.net/vol1/dvd08/htm/port2.htm. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[Fightingbasques.net-2] Pedro J. Oiarzabal and Guillermo Tabernilla (2017). "El enigma del mito y la historia: Basque Code Talkers en la Segunda Guerra Mundial'". Saibigain.

[http://www.fightingbasques.net/es-es/-3] "Fighting Basques, proyecto de memoria de la Asociación Sancho de Beurko".

[El_diario_vasco-4] "Un estudio desmiente que el euskera se usara en código en la Segunda Guerra Mundial". diariovasco.com.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]