User talk:Jckrgn600

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jckrgn600! I am Bluefist and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Bluefist ^talk 22:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) Jckrgn600 (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concern[edit]

Hello, I noticed that most of your edits seem to be just changing the spacing of text in articles (e.g., adding a space or blank line). While such edits are not disallowed per se, it's not really the best idea for all of your edits or even most to be simply changing the spacing in an article and nothing else. I hope this helps! — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 22:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some cosmetic changes, is it bad ? Jckrgn600 (talk) 22:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, it's not bad! What I'm trying to say is, don't just focus on the cosmetic changes but also make content changes in addition to the cosmetic changes :) — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anthony Carone, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Myxodagnus walkeri constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. James'ööders 11:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok, you mean this, right? 'cause red wine redirects to wine color and this Dactyloscopidae redirects to Sand stargazer and tropical redirects to tropics Jckrgn600 (talk) 11:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Adam May. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. James'ööders 11:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok, but please tell me what part of that edit was not right? Jckrgn600 (talk) 11:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have examined your edits, and to call them "vandalism" makes no sense at all. It is clear that jamesooders did not understand what you were doing, and has now admitted the mistake. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Your edits are indeed not vandalism, but I will note that bypassing redirects with piped links (as you did for example here) is generally not a good idea. WP:NOTBROKEN should explain why. Yoenit (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the page for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Dugan_%28audio_engineer%29, I believe that you have edited to include information that he has sung with the Bach Collegium San Diego. This is not the case. The bio on his website states that he sang with the "San Diego Bach Chorus" in his youth. This is a completely separate group. This activity of his would have been back in the 60s or so and the BCSD has been performing for 8 seasons now. If his bio says "San Diego Bach Chorus", please do not assume that this is the same as the "Bach Collegium San Diego" because Google returned it as a similar result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.93.179.23 (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reworking redirects[edit]

I understand the instinct to see a link that's a redirect and to replace it with a direct link to the finished page, as you did at Roger Spy. However, there are reasons why that is not only unneeded, it's a bad idea -- see WP:NOTBROKEN for an explanation. Let me know if you have any questions! --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Can you make a point of adding edit summaries? It makes it easier for other editor to check article development and to double check your work. Cheer. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish skeleton collection[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up the links I appreciate it.7mike5000 (talk) 10:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no problem. Jckrgn600 (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]