User talk:Jd0111a

Look, lets discuss the article on 33 strategies.: if you try to do an extended summary of the book, there is no chance in my opinion that it will hold up at AfD. If you try a modest article--who knows, the reviews may be sufficient. Your choice, I'm trying to cut down the article to preserve it. I strongly suggest you restore my previous version--I'm no going to edit war about it, but I am going to follow this up one way or another. So cut it as far as you think you can, and then Ill decide whether to go to dispute resolution or afd. . DGG (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Deanleogrande.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Deanleogrande.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 12:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:CorneliusKerwin.jpg

You uploaded or restored , File:CorneliusKerwin.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps:

If the {{media by uploader}} tag is present please add, a |claimed=yes parameter to the tag.
If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please change it to {{img-claimed}}

to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amentum (company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amentum (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Needs more sources to establish notability, preferably from sources that are not from the company itself. Notability is borderline, needs more references.✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updated with greater references from outside sources / trade publications. Company is the 2nd largest non-OEM defense contractor in the United States at over $9b per Bloomberg. Jd0111a (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amentum (company) has been accepted

Amentum (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--VersaceSpace 🌃 05:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amentum Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amentum Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]