User talk:Jdeol14

Welcome!

Hello, Jdeol14, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zubair Ali Khan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zubair Ali Khan

The article Zubair Ali Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not yet notable per WP:CREATIVE, with no significant coverage online from WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources, just a passing mention in a review of his only film directed to date.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm NeemNarduni2. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Zubair Ali Khan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Zubair Ali Khan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Zubair Ali Khan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kwApjwKvwc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0wRLwXFPu8, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggYZlFnLGjY, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBQk90PKH6c, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EVasHojg3M, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9C30uMD-LM&index=30&list=PLCSIpMp7NLf46J-tQpbPALIgA8g7EVNch, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NIBKB-YWPM&index=23&list=PLCSIpMp7NLf46J-tQpbPALIgA8g7EVNch, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2Qk2a9wyb0&list=PLCSIpMp7NLf46J-tQpbPALIgA8g7EVNch&index=22, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGV2Auq9vc&index=19&list=PLCSIpMp7NLf46J-tQpbPALIgA8g7EVNch, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa4UAHqKJ4A&list=PLCSIpMp7NLf46J-tQpbPALIgA8g7EVNch&index=20) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zubair Ali Khan. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Zubair Ali Khan, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zubair Ali Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zubair Ali Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Zubair Ali Khan‎. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]