User talk:Jenny.wombat

I moved "Jenny.wombat/sandbox" to User:Jenny.wombat/sandbox.[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I moved "Jenny.wombat/sandbox" to User:Jenny.wombat/sandbox. I was supposing that you are going to create a sandbox page. Sandbox pages need "User" at the top. All your information is there. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 17:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to move it out of sandbox with new name "Business Reference and Services Section (BRASS)" but I can't figure out how to change the name of the page, so I can make it an article. Jenny.wombat (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History Section (HS) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to History Section (HS). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collection Development and Evaluation Section (CODES) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Collection Development and Evaluation Section (CODES). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Business Reference and Services Section (BRASS) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Business Reference and Services Section (BRASS). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse invitation[edit]

Hello! Jenny.wombat, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Services Section (RSS) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Reference Services Section (RSS). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reference and User Services Association NEW[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reference and User Services Association NEW, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.ala.org/rusa/contact/interest-groups, https://www.ala.org/rusa/sections/ets, and https://www.ala.org/rusa/about}. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Would it be possible to get the page you deleted moved into my sandbox? I worked very hard on the structure and would like to keep it while adding my own words instead of using snippets from the RUSA page.

BTW, I am not an employee of the RUSA, but a proud member of our non-profit.

Thank you,

Jenny.wombat Jenny.wombat (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, The more I learn about Wiki the more I am lost... Can you please move this deleted page to DRAFT so others can work on it too.

Thanks

Jenny.wombat (talk) Jenny.wombat (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Jenny.wombat! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on editing problems[edit]

Hello, Jenny.wombat, and welcome to contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you will have a successful time here, but I have noticed some problems, and I would like to offer you some information and advice which I hope may be helpful to you.

You have gone straight into creating new articles, at a very early stage in your time as a Wikipedia editor. Creating articles is actually one of the most difficult tasks on Wikipedia, especially for a fairly new editor, because there are so many things that can go wrong. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.
If, despite my advice above, you do decide to create new articles, then, rather than posting them directly as articles, create drafts and submit them for review as articles for creation. This is because several pages which uou have created have been very unsuitable as articles, and there are two possible outcomes: either someone moves the article to draftspace, in which case you might as well have put it there in the first place, or the article gets deleted, whereas had it been a draft you might have been allowed time to improve it.
It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account.
It looks very much as though some, or maybe even all, of your editing relates to one or more organisations to which you have a personal connection. If so then please read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest before you do any more editing (if you haven't already done so) and make sure you comply with it.
A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, but much of your writing has given the clear impression of being written to impress on the reader a positive view of what you have been writing about.
Several pages that you have posted as articles have not even looked complete: they have included long lists of section headings with no content under the headings. Please keep pages in that state as drafts, to be moved out as articles only when they are ready.

I am sorry to throw at you such a wall of warnings, but I do so in the hope of helping you to avoid problems which may develop if you aren't aware of the relevant points. As I said above, I hope you will have a successful time contributing to Wikipedia, and please feel welcome to contact me if there is more advice you think I may be able to give you. JBW (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your support to a new editor. I will put my material in Draftspace and have it reviewed before I post it as an article. I will try to rephrase the factual content about RUSA. I am a member of RUSA, but I don't work for them. I believe in the mission of Wikipedia and hope my contributions will be stronger. Jenny.wombat (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that my page in question was deleted and I can't get to it anymore. I have spend a lot of hours creating it and would like to edit what I started. Can you please undelete the page into the my drafts so I can edit it.

Thank you,

Jenny.wombat (talk) 20:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Jenny.wombat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]