User talk:Jeonjubibimbap

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruslanguage

Hello Jeonjubibimbap,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ruslanguage for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

advice

as reviewing admin, I deleted it --for the second time. You would need good 3rd party references from reliable sources to show the school is notable. Please do not try to enter it again otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 19:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi, you have two problems if your article is to meet our criteria:

You did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You do not explain what makes this language school important enough for an encyclopaedia entry, and in fact give no factual information about the company at all — student numbers, turnover, profit etc.
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You just tell us what it is selling, not just the courses, but even organised trips. Why is the address given, you don't put contact details in an encyclopaedia

As the previous message says, the article has no chance unless you can explain what makes this school notable, with third party references from reliable sources to support your claim Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Working in a user page is a good idea. Before you do too much work, check that school really does meet the notability criteria as linked above, or you may be wasting your time. Quite a few articles about businesses slip under the radar with articles that are too promotional or don't have proper third-party references or don't really prove notability. I can't really suggest a good model for you to follow. You can give details of course levels, but bear in mind that the more there is about the product compared to the purely factual information, the more likely it is to be seen as spammy. Notable people are effectively defined by whether they have stable articles that meet the notability guidelines for people It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references. As a matter of policy, all biographies of living people will be deleted if they do not have references Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]