User talk:JeyReydar97
This is JeyReydar97's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() |
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Triangle Ribbon Championship
- added a link pointing to Kawasaki
- World Woman Pro-Wrestling Diana Queen Elizabeth Championship
- added a link pointing to Kawasaki
- World Woman Pro-Wrestling Diana World Championship
- added a link pointing to Kawasaki
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Please leave descriptive edit summaries
[edit] Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.
I see you have been editing with this account for more than five years, so let's not pretend you don't know any better; this report on xtools shows that you've left summaries on only 2.5% of your major edits.
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs
00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. To be honest yes, I've recently thought about my edits that I've done without summaries in the past and I realised it's wrong. The truth is that I always considered the majority my edits as being sort of minor, though I almost never used the summary button in the context. You're very right about what you said above. Just changed my preferences settings so I'll get reminded about the summaries any time I make an edit. Thank you very much for reaching me about this. I'll consider this as being the first and last major warning. Best regards! JeyReydar97 (talk) 11:23, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for taking the criticism well. While I appreciate that many edits may seem trivial or mundane and not worthy of description, like minor copy edits or maintenance work, at the moment an editor submits any edit, only they know what they did and why; every other editor who sees it in their watchlist, recent changes or later in page histories has no clue what happened without examining the diff(s), which is frankly a massive pain in the butt. I'm pleased this encounter proved a positive one. Happy editing and see you around :)
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs
21:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)- Yeah, I agree. It's hard to see if other people correctly modify articles. For example, I often get very confused when people edit ongoing events, not being able to immediately figure out if the information is correct or not, just due to the lack of summaries, so the diffs are really a pain to examine. Thanks again for reaching me out. See you around too! JeyReydar97 (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for taking the criticism well. While I appreciate that many edits may seem trivial or mundane and not worthy of description, like minor copy edits or maintenance work, at the moment an editor submits any edit, only they know what they did and why; every other editor who sees it in their watchlist, recent changes or later in page histories has no clue what happened without examining the diff(s), which is frankly a massive pain in the butt. I'm pleased this encounter proved a positive one. Happy editing and see you around :)
Tudor Arghezi House
[edit]Hi, i've just reviewed this article. It is good but needs some rewording and references 1 and 5 need fixing, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for your notice. I am currently working on it in order to find better references. Refs 1 and 5 are provisional momentarily. I just translated the article from its Romanian counterpart so I'm not yet able to call it a good one though but thanks for the encouragement :) Best regards! JeyReydar97 (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi JeyReydar97. Thank you for your work on Song About Nothing. Another editor, Lordseriouspig, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start. I would recommend adding a few more sources, and specifying where in the paragraph the sources are used, instead of just being at the end of the paragraph.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lordseriouspig}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lordseriouspig 09:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Lordseriouspig: Hello. Thanks for reaching me out! Yeah, most of the references I use for music articles mainly point out the entire idea of the paragraph and that's indeed a bit cofusing while reading. Until some time ago I used to end each sentence with a source link. However, the reason why I usually place them at the end of the paragraph now is because I was always getting them repositioned by other users this way so I always saw it as an must do. But thanks for your advice and help. I'll put more refs into the article. Just need some time to find more articles written by notable publications. Best regards! JeyReydar97 (talk) 10:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)