User talk:Jinno.e

Your question[edit]

You may wish to contact wikipedia. See here.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Analog Pussy[edit]

Erez, Next time I will ask this article to be protected. I will also ask to ban you. Please avoid editing wars.Ofir michael (talk) 07:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you are welcome to contact me directly to my email - in order to represent your sister, - and to resolve the conflicts. Jinno.e (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not representing anyone. The things you wrote in the article are outrageous. A wikipedia article is not a tool to promote yourself, sell tickets and CDs, and send messages out to the world. It should be based of facts, better yet relevant facts. The operators will not like it that you are editing this article since it's about yourself. I am going to restore it to its proper state. Do not edit it again. That said, I will be glad to add balanced and objective info to this article. You may contact me at any time.Ofir michael (talk) 12:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ofir michael (talk • contribs) 11:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Analog Pussy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Michig (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More edit wars[edit]

Michig, Erez has continued his editing war as can be seen here. I ask of you to re-block him, this time for a longer period of time. Also, there is a matter of Conflict of interest, since this article is partially about him, and as such, shouldn't be editing this article.Ofir michael (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Michig (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jinno.e (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Jinno.e (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See where it says "Your reason here"? You're supposed to replace that with the reason you think you should be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive309. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ofir michael (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]