User talk:Jithu Wilson C

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

accidentally happened Jithu Wilson C (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

RE: Special:Contributions/Jithu_Wilson_C-- that's a lot of accidents. I'm afraid I cannot unblock someone who might have more such accidents. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made edit to replace abuse content Jithu Wilson C (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you didn't. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to remove the abuse content from Wiki. These are the reason: 1) I tried to remove some lines from this article; Because this Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riya_Sen contains abuse and violent information. This article gives importance to the abuse activities of a violent personality. Here is the proof: 2nd paragraph of the heading 'Modeling career'. Abuse external Citation link no 21, Abuse external link of citation 44, Abuse external link of citation 43. 2) I tried to remove the abuse poster image of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bang_Bang! 3) I tried to remove the abuse poster image of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_No._21 Therefore my account need to be unblocked. Jithu Wilson C (talk) 13:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not clear to me that your attempted edits were appropriate. For example, you say that you attempted to "remove the abuse poster image", but in what way was the image inappropriate? It's properly justified for fair-use. And, of course, your edits weren't even doing what you were attempting to do. I think if we unblock you, you'll make the same sort of edits again. Therefore, we should leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

and furthemore,

if here, here, and this with an edit summary of "simple updation", and here are your ideas of constructive editing, then WP:CIR applies. AND if we accept that at face value, in you earlier unblock request you said "accidentally happened." Both cannot be true. If you continue to abuse unblock requests, we will remove your ability to edit your talk page. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In what what way the poster image of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_No._21 is not inappropriate? Jithu Wilson C (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In what way was it not appropriate?? Since you clearly do not understand why you were blocked, will you not continue the same sort of disruption? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not remove declined unblock requests from this page; if you do so again, I will revoke your talkpage access. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You asked in what way the poster image, File:Table No 21 official poster.jpg, was appropriate. It's appropriate because it meets the criteria outlined in WP:FU, therefore is in accord with WP:COPYRIGHT. Additionally, the image was released as part of a promotional effort on behalf of the movie. If you think this image is inappropriate, it is most likely because you do not understand WP:NOTCENSORED. --Yamla (talk) 14:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? A Bowdler? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of WP:NOTCENSORED therefore I am asking unblock requestJithu Wilson C (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Being unaware of a core guideline is not a valid unblock reason. Because through multiple appeals you have failed to demonstrate an understanding of why you have been blocked I am revoking your access to this talk page. Any future appeal would need to be made via WP:UTRS but would need to demonstrate a far better understanding to have any chance of success. Just Chilling (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jithu Wilson C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20274 was submitted on Jan 09, 2018 09:44:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]