User talk:Jjx04

August 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sing for Absolution, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Black Holes and Revelations, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Absolution (album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Planet Telex. Rob van vee 08:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear you are hell bent on getting blocked again. Keep it up, your behavior will make this wish come true. Rob van vee 08:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Pyramid Song. Binksternet (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Knights of Cydonia. Rob van vee 05:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK Computer genre

Hi,

Please, before making any other changes to the genre of OK Computer, read this post at the talk page.

tl;dr: Dozens of human beings have devoted hundreds of volunteer hours over years, in common purpose and cooperation, to think through issues like the album's genre, to pore over the existing source material and to think critically about the Wikipedia community's standards, to give shape to this article the way it is today. I would ask that you not trod over parts of the page as it exists just because you think the consensus achieved is wrong, and to engage with other editors and think about what the reasons might be that other users have decided to exclude genres you have listed. —BLZ · talk 18:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 123.136.112.219 (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jjx04. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]