Jump to content

User talk:Jkl21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of NinjaMonkey

[edit]

A tag has been placed on NinjaMonkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. User Doe ☻T ☼C 01:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Albury junior badminton club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accurizer (talk) 10:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Albury Junior Badminton Club, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for the note on my talk page. Administrators will give you time to improve the article but you will have to demonstrate relatively soon why the club is truly notable and appropriate for inclusion in the encyclopedia (see Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). For guidance you should see Wikipedia:Places of local interest. The most convincing way to demonstrate notablilty would be to cite one or more reliable sources, such as newspaper or magazine articles. Best of luck. Accurizer (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I have left a reply on my talk page.--JodyB talk 15:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Jarrett & Lam Consulting

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jarrett & Lam Consulting, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. A. B. (talkcontribs) 17:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]