User talk:Jllego
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Syrthiss (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Porter Gohn Inticusa
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Porter Gohn Inticusa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Slon02 (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The article City in the mountains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Articles fails WP:N and WP:BK. It has no sources and I could not find any to establish notability. --Slon02 (talk) 19:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slon02 (talk) 19:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Porter Gohn Inticusa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- un-notable character from an un-notable series of books. I could not find any sources to verify the notability of this character, or of the books that he appears in.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slon02 (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of G7 Exite
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on G7 Exite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. First Light (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Artificial Christmas tree, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Artificial Christmas tree was changed by Jllego (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937181 on 2012-04-11T16:26:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Artificial Christmas tree with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SupernovaExplosion Talk 16:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Artificial Christmas tree with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. SupernovaExplosion Talk 16:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Artificial Christmas tree. SupernovaExplosion Talk 16:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Last April my friends hacked my laptop and opened all of my tabs. I had just been on Wikipedia and I was still logged in, my friends then went to a page and began vandalizing it, which made it seem as though I was the one doing it. I feel like I have been blocked unfaily because it was my "friends" who were vandalizing the page, not I. ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)