User talk:Jmccorm

THIS IS MY QUESTION: Roomba page[edit]

INTRO: Hi. I've been making changes to the Roomba page, and I've run into a political problem. I want, and it seems that others want this as well, to add the excellent Roomba Review forums [[1]] to the list of external links. But it looks like another user, in Talk:Roomba, says he continues to remove it from the external links section, and he directs other users not to add it back in. Reason: says that a forum cannot be verified as a reliable source.

QUESTION: Is it appropriate to add user forums, not as a regular external link, but as a website in the external link section of a page?

EXPLANATION: A bit of justification for this particular link. The Roomba Review forum, which I'd like to add, has 19k messages since 2004, and easily does a dozen new messages a day. Second in line would be iRobot's official forum at Yahoo! Groups, with 13k messages from 2002, having approx 2 new messages per day. (I don't know if it'd be appropriate to add a second forum or not. Or if an official forum should take precidence.) Oddly enough, there is already another forum listed in the external links section. Since 2005, it has 27 messages. I believe this should be removed.

PROBLEM: As mentioned in the intro, another user is claiming that any link for a forum is forbidden. Even in the external link section.

CLOSING: Can you help us find an appropriate understanding or solution to this issue? This is an incredibly relevant link, and isn't, at least on my behalf, a case of playing favorites with the link section. --Jmccorm 16:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EL is the official policy. WP:NOT says you may have ONE fan-site link. Xiner (talk, email) 16:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick response. Is it, then, appropriate for me to replace the weak forum (27 messages) with the strongest one (19k messages), or with the official company forum for users (13k messages)? (If so, which, or is it my choice?) --Jmccorm 16:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd insert the biggest fan site, which is not official in this case. I'd try to work out the compromise on the article talk page, explaining your rationale first, however. Xiner (talk, email) 17:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A welcome from Sango123[edit]

Hello, Jmccorm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango 123 23:55, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Helpme[edit]

Hi. Please state your question, then replace the {{helpme}} tag on your user talk page. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 16:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're a good editor[edit]

that is all :) Mewnst (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]