User talk:Joe Heato

Psychokinesis

Hi. I just wanted to clarify why I reverted your edit at Psychokinesis. I don't believe it is necessary to say that "Most scientists maintain that no convincing evidence exists" rather than "there is no convincing evidence that psychokinesis is a real phenomenon". I would suggest that almost all scientists would agree that there is no convincing evidence for the phenomenon. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 21:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I don't disagree with enforcing the skeptical perspective on wikipedia (see my edit to telepathy), but it seemed to me that some edits reflected the sources in a biased manner not justified by the original surce (e.g., the rendition of the AIR report in the Stargate project).Joe Heato (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Heato, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Joe Heato! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)