User talk:Joemenson

April 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Valeriu Gagiu, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 98th Flying Training Squadron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hello. I would like to apologize for my vandalism and the way I acted in yalls talk pages. I was just messing around and I now see the harm in that and understand the importance of what it is you do. I would like to argue for my abilities back so I can keep it in the sandbox. I'm sorry.

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joemenson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I would like to apologize for my vandalism and the way I acted in other users talk pages. I was just messing around and I now see the harm in that and understand the importance of what it is you do. I would like to argue for my abilities back so I can keep it in the sandbox. I'm sorry.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, only one request at a time, please. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for your apology. What do you intend to do on Wikipedia if you are unblocked? 331dot (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joemenson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I am unblocked I intend to

                             1: Keep my fun edits in the sandbox.
                             2: Instead of making childish edits, begin making constructive well sourced edits.
                             3: Apologize to the mods I was rude to on their talk pages. 
                             4: Have more respect for the rules on Wikipedia.

Again, I'm sorry for what I did and I understand if what I did is to bad to unblock me, but I am sorry.

Decline reason:

Your sandbox is not a place to make "fun" edits, but a place to make test edits and/or draft articles. Stating you will "begin making constructive well sourced edits" is a start but we will need to know what sorts of constructive well sourced edits you will make, and/or what areas of Wikipedia you will edit. Your apology is much appreciated, but I'm not convinced at this time that unblocking you will be a benefit to the project; if fooling around in your sandbox is mostly what you want to do here, you don't need to be unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. If you haven't already, I would suggest reading WP:GAB before making another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.