User talk:JoyGenea

JoyGenea, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JoyGenea! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello JoyGenea. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JoyGenea. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JoyGenea|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 08:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS, Hope you're doing well. That's true that I have a connection with Wegz, we are a PR company called Takwene and Wegz is a client of ours. Actually, My Supervisor "Ahmed Raafat" tried to hire someone who is familiar with Wikipedia rules to publish this article but due too the high cost of writing the article and then publishing it he assigned it to me to publish but, unfortunately, I wasn't aware of COI rules and for sure we would be happy to declare our connection and stick to the rules and policies of Wikipedia. I want to state that it was my first-time edit with COI and all of my previous minor edits were edited of my own volition. I'm ready to share a piece of evidence that we only hired a freelancer to write the article and didn't use it at the end. I have disclosed on my user page and in the article talks page too and I'm happy to submit it through articles for creation to male sure that we are following Wikimedia Terms of Use. Thanks! JoyGenea (talk) 01:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you weren't hired through a freelancing platform? GSS ^💬 04:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sure. We spoke to several freelancers on Upwork but honestly, no one hired for publishing Wegz's article it was me the writer and the publisher. The account we have used on Upwork in Under Mina Gamal's name "me" and who submitted this task for me was Ahmed Raafat, my supervisor and the general manager also, he was the same person who used Upwork account besides me. Here's his LinkedIn account just to let you make sure that Ahmed Raafat is a real person and not just a claim and Here's mine too. My duty is to follow the policies here as there is nothing to hide. I have recorded all the chats and the evidence that there wasn't anyone hired for publishing the article and if you would like, i can share it with you. Regards. -- JoyGenea (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wegz (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are mostly passing mentions and announcements and I'm not seeing any evidence of satisfying WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wegz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wegz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 05:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wegz

Hello, JoyGenea. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wegz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]