User talk:Jpopxfg

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert C. Jackson (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert C. Jackson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Jpopxfg, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert C. Jackson

Hello, Jpopxfg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert C. Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert C. Jackson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert C. Jackson. Thanks! SeraphWiki (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert C. Jackson has been accepted

Robert C. Jackson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Dakota Art Museum (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Dakota Art Museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Dakota Art Museum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

July 15 revision of Valsartan article.

Your revision removed my CNN reference as well as "Major Pharmaceuticals" and "Teva Pharmaceuticals" as companies recalling their products because, you say, they are not affected. You are mistaken. The original reference is https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm613532.htm. Secondly, you say that the "FDA recalled" the product. This is also incorrect--the recalls are voluntary and being made by the companies themselves. The reason for my referencing CNN rather than the FDA is that wikipedia prefers secondary sources over primary sources. It is not a research journal.

If you do not make these corrections, I will undo your revisions. MidwestGeek (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Yes, I removed it because I thought the fda.gov page I referenced was something official but now I see you are correct: it was an FDA news item just announcing what Solco did, a voluntary recall.

If you could point me to a discussion or explanation of why would you not want to include more primary sources like the URL from the FDA site above. How does one reconcile discrepancies that may be found in a secondary source when it makes mistakes in attributing facts from a primary source? And also if the primary source is found to be incorrect in future investigations?

I will edit that part back in. If I remember there was a duplicate citation to the CNN URL but it may have been exactly the same text with a slightly different headline or timestamp. Jpopxfg (talk) 01:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Reply to Jpopxfg of July 16 (UTC)

Concerning wikipedia policy on sources, the shortcut is WP:PSTS. Perhaps an FDA press release is in a gray area between primary and secondary, but in general, the target audience for wikipedia are people interested but unfamiliar with technical jargon and the like. The CNN reporter simply summarized the various press releases and provided a little background information, which is why I chose them.

I had entered two distinct CNN articles, one on July 6 concerning European actions and another from July 13 about the FDA joining in. They have completely different titles, which I quoted, so I don't see how they could be conflated or confused. There was an anonymous user who didn't distinguish them and screwed up the referencing briefly, but I undid his/her changes almost immediately. MidwestGeek (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:South Dakota Art Museum

Hello, Jpopxfg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South Dakota Art Museum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)