User talk:Jsmitchell

Do not revert changes to Suzanne Jovin without providing a valid reason agreed upon by other editors. Total reversion of another editor’s good faith work, without valid reason, is against Wikipedia rules. In addition, your earlier version of the Jovin article violated multiple rules against original research, lack of sources, and fanaticism. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia editing policies, and do not "undo” others’ edits again, or risk another warning for disruptive editing. CagedRage (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my note in the discussion area. Please email me at jmitchel@optonline.net and I'll be happy to give you my home phone number as my goal is to solve the Jovin murder, not memorialize it, so I truly try to keep an open mind. Vanity should have nothing to do with it. Thanks. 15:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jsmitchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Izzy007 23:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC) (My Talk Page)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JovinPoster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JovinPoster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 06:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:JovinPoliceSketch.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JovinPoliceSketch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MeNMaGirls Mingalarpar.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MeNMaGirls Mingalarpar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MeNMaGirls YearofTiger.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MeNMaGirls YearofTiger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]