Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Double Dare, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hutaree, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Okcupid Profiles are not acceptable for Sources on living people particularly Since there is no garuntee that it is related to the person it is referencing since Okcupid Profiles use Screen Names. Please Refer to WP:RELIABLE before adding sources with controversial information with a primary source. If you can find a secondary source with the same information then it is welcome. In addition you deleted a source for another paragraph while adding your poorly sourced information please Refrain from doing this in the future. Weaponbb7 (talk) 21:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Table column widths for Operators in C and C++
I agree with your edit to Operators in C and C++, however this causes the columns of the tables to now be misaligned. I had made them (mostly) aligned in a previous edit. Could we find a set of widths (percentages) for the columns across most of the tables so that they look neatly aligned, especially on browsers whose window is not set to full-screen width? — Loadmaster (talk) 18:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean that the columns from one section to the next don't line up? Doesn't that vary for every screen and browser anyway? I'd rather see the column width change to fit the text rather than trying to match one table to the next, but if you want to make them match, it's up to you. I just don't want the code examples to wrap, because they become jumbled and harder to read.
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Justanothervisitor; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Justanothervisitor :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)