User talk:Justforfun990

December 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you recently removed content from Keung To without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fragrant Peony (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Keung To, you may be blocked from editing. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justforfun990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apologies for not adequately explained my reason of editing the page, as I was urging to remove false information about a celebrity. Now I notice the requirement and the necessity of explaining reasons behind those changes, in particular big chances. Kindly please unblock me. Thanks.

Decline reason:

It would have been inappropriate to remove that content even if you explained yourself. The content appeared to be generally well-cited, with the exception of using Facebook for reference. Therefore, you need consensus on the article's talk page, or need to demonstrate the other citations do not meet WP:RS. Yamla (talk) 11:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.