User talk:Jw100

Jw100, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jw100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Little Neston, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC) If I do that will you stop deleting my transport edits and fianaly leave me alone?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jw100 (talk • contribs) [reply]

This is not your website, it is the community's. Quit being so possessive and assume good faith from users who know what they're doing. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Sorry it's Just He Keeps Deleting nearly every WIKI I post 1 day after I post it and about 3 or 2 hours was wasted finding the right information and I don't know why. There is only 2 left that he hasn't touched I am only trying to help different community's out with Transport and because I forgot to add a timetable Source Charles kept deleting them and it made me feel that I couldn't share my Knowledge and made me feel upset I never knew that you had to provide sources I will in the future User:Jw100|Jw100]] (talk) 02:01 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Charlesdrakew

He'll see the message the next time he's online. There's no need to send the same message three times over. —C.Fred (talk) 01:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Charlesdrakew. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Intentionally leaving the same message over and over is hard to ascribe to innocent error. —C.Fred (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. At the top of the edit page, it says "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone," which means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site. -- You do not have a "wiki" here. You are using this already existing community's site, which happens to have collected a number of social contracts, precedents, and norms over the years.
Wikipedia is not a cook-book, instruction manual, travel guide, or train schedule.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research.
Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).

Ian.thomson (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Billinghurst. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]