User talk:Kai875

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 9 (Lil' Kim album) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 9 (Lil' Kim album) was changed by Kai875 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951656 on 2021-03-03T00:03:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Apoxyomenus (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pink Friday, you may be blocked from editing. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Nicki Minaj discography. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn’t a joke, if you research into her sales, most of them are outdated certifications. Kai875 (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blame it on her record label(s). We report attributable facts as said by reliable sources. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay? if you research into her certifications you will find the factual sales information? Kai875 (talk) 02:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. [...] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources.". (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I link my source? Kai875 (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it was published in the media. There was controversy over whether Cardi B used payola. I’m not saying she did i’m talking about the controversy surrounding the single. There are many sources that can back this up, so i’m confused as to why you deleted reliable information? Kai875 (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because you didn't cite any source. As simple as that. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do i cite my source i’m new to wikipedia? Kai875 (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to Help:Referencing for beginners, and please if someone asks you to stop, just stop and use the talk pages, like you are doing it right now. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thankyou for your help Kai875 (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pink Friday has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pink Friday was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/nmrumorsandtea/status/1208519894796525569) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bodak Yellow edits

Hi, I've reverted your edits on the Bodak Yellow page referencing a payola controversy. These claims were made almost a year after the release of Bodak Yellow, and Minaj did not reference Bodak Yellow in her accusations. Please stop with such edits. --LivelyRatification (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]