User talk:Kapaaian

Image copyright problem with Image:Wolf poster.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wolf poster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Eyeball Papercuts"

A page you created, Eyeball Papercuts, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eyeball Papercuts has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bullcrank has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Neither the group nor its films appear to be notable per Wikipedia:Notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I work with some notable people, but that doesn't make me notable. You need to show that the group itself has been recognized as notable by reliable independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- IMDB - no, because anyone can submit an article on themselves to it. Filmthreat -- depends, I'd want to see the reference. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - The Washington Post article doesn't specifically mention Bullcrank. I personally don't consider the Filmthreat listing to satisfy WP:V. But if you disagree, go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and follow the instructions there. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - - That's a student newspaper and two blogs. Honestly, I don't think you're there yet. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - Your sources have to be reliable. Again, please read WP:RS. I'm done for today. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolf poster.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Wolf poster.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolf poster.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wolf poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]