Jump to content

User talk:Kashif choudhary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unreliable sources[edit]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Bhutto article[edit]

While I'd like to believe you are acting in good faith your edits appear to be vandalism since you have deliberately added wrong information to a source. Please stop vandalizing the Bhutto article or you will be blocked from editing further. If you'd like to contribute to Wikipedia check this page to get started [1]. Thanks.(olive (talk) 04:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zafar Chaudhry, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Fazal Mahmood. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Mohammad Saeed (cricketer). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Malik Mohammad Qayyum. Jim1138 (talk) 09:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Malik Mohammad Qayyum. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Arain[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arain. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Charles (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sindhi Rajput, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Charles (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Asadullah Bhutto, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop adding bold text against policy. Charles (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mehar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Samina Khalid Ghurki. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Samina Khalid Ghurki, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Charles (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Arain, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Arain, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Charles (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mian (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammad Saeed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of two weeks.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]