User talk:Keithbrooks

Chris Garneau

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Chris Garneau, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Keith! "Receiving critical acclaim" for a single off his debut album doesn't meet notability requirements. Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kieth! Per the guideline, you really should have reliable source(s) that report on his performance(s) in the major cities. Actually, most of the ones listed in a news search on Google are probably good: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22chris+garneau%22&btnG=Search+News

As an added comment that you probably don't want to hear, most of the references you have on the page aren't very good. The Queerty one is fine, but the others are blogs and myspace, which are not acceptable. See WP:SPS and WP:RS.

Sorry if I seem harsh - the initial reading I did of the article was because he's in an LGBT cat. I (and others in the LGBT WikiProject go through every article in our cats to make sure they have sources and are "up to snuff". The previous version of the article not only didn't state notability, but since he's only had one album out and is fairly new, I wanted to make sure he was actually somebody, not just a kid in a garage band :)

Thanks for the work you've done / are doing :) Happy editing! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking much better! Thanks for all that work - now it's looking like a real article :) If you have any questions whatsoever, don't hesitate to drop me a note! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the nice note :-) Dave --David Shankbone 14:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brucereyes-chow.jpg

Hello Keith, I see you have uploaded a picture at Image:Brucereyes-chow.jpg. You have labeled it as GFDL, but I don't see a release from the photographer (or a link to the original). Could you clear this up?

Thanks, --Jdeboer (talk) 06:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Brucereyes-chow.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brucereyes-chow.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]