User talk:Kerne

Welcome!

Hello, Kerne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Khoikhoi 00:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative names

Hey Kerne,

I noticed that you've been removing the historical names on Turkish city articles. Here at Wikipedia most articles list the historical names at the top, even though the names aren't offical. See the Gdańsk article for example - it has the German name, but it hasn't been part of Germany since WWII. Also look at the Stepanakert article - it has the Azerbaijani name right next to the offical Armenian one. Or check this out, the Turkish names are all listed at Crete, Kos, Rhodes, and Komotini. Surely if we have the Turkish names for Greek articles then it should be the other way around. --Khoikhoi 02:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish is the official language throughout Turkey. You may insert the greek or armenian versions somewhere in the body, but these certainly does not belong in the introduction/opening line of an article. Stephanakert/ Karabakh is disputed as is Kardak. There's a difference.

There's no Wikipedia rule that says only offical names have to be at the top - they're already the title. --Khoikhoi 02:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine. Lets have a little experiment.

I have removed your edits from the Athens and Sofia articles.the greek and bulgarian names are not mentioned in Istanbul either, and also the greek name in Ankara is used as the name from which the current derives, and it is written in Hellenistic Greek, not Modern Greek.

Btw,Imia is not disputed.Regards--Hectorian 03:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on an article. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Khoikhoi 03:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just no double standards. Lets see you play the "Im so neutral" champion at the Athens and Sofia articles

I'll watch the Sofia, Plovdiv, and Burgas articles, but Athens is pushing it - the Greek name isn't at the Istanbul page for one thing. --Khoikhoi 03:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ahmed_Dogan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ahmed_Dogan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]