User talk:Khafesho

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Khafesho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hayedeh Legendary Persian Diva. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 22:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Your addition to Sepideh (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia from here without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Jockzain (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khafesho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have been blocked for a reason which is 100% incorrect. I would like to appeal the block decision. Thanks guys.

Decline reason:

The reason for the block seems fairly sound; could you possibly address the concerns raised at the investigation? Kuru (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khafesho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Kuru, In the 'invetigation' it has been mentioned that 1- I have used photos by PersianDutchNetwork. So what is the problem? They are available in Wikimedia Commons so all contributors can link to them. 2- "Changing Iranian to Persian wherever possible". Whereever? No just where the issue is related to pre-1935 Iran. because the land's official name before 1935 has been Persia. it is a fact not my personal opinion. 3- Ëditing "Hayedeh legendary Persian diva". Again, is it a red line? I have contributed to various Persian speaking documentaries; the latest one has been "Sepideh". What is wrong with that? Have I added something against the rules? once one editor wrote me not to copy a text for that film and I rewrite that. Which part of my contributions is against Wikipedia rules? Thanks for clarifying.--Khafesho (talk) 1:11 am, 14 September 2014, last Sunday (2 days ago) (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.