User talk:Khnaatif

Welcome!

Hello, Khnaatif, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Symbion scientific & medical solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Beloved Freak 12:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Symbion scientific & medical solutions

A tag has been placed on Symbion scientific & medical solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Beloved Freak 12:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your addition to Symbion scientific & medical solutions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Beloved Freak 12:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

The article was flagged as a copyright violation because it was a copy of http://www.symbion-solutions.com/about-us.php. Wikipedia cannot hold information copied from elsewhere unless a formal copyright release has been made. It is not enough to say that you wrote the material, or that you give permission, because there is no way to be sure that someone on the end of a wire is who he says.

In any case, it is not usually worth giving permission to reproduce a company web-site, because they are written in a promotional tone, and often in the first person: "Our experienced team... we provide full technical support... our well experienced engineers... " That is not an encyclopedia article, it is an advertisement.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory or a vehicle for any kind of promotion. Articles have to be of enough general interest for an encyclopedia article: the Wikipedia term for that is Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have other people, independent of the subject, thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? More detail in Notability (organizations and companies).

Also, articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and so people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own organizations, because of the conflict of interest involved.

For more advice, read the FAQ/Organizations, in particular the sections headed:

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your apology, but it is absolutely not necessary - in fact, I feel that we should apologise. Wikipedia is so keen to get everyone to come and edit that we do not do a very good job of explaining in advance what Wikipedia is not for, so there is no way you could have known all the things I explained above. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]