User talk:Kidcharles
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]Hello, Kidcharles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. My name is Hdt83. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to the free encyclopedia anybody can edit. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to leave me a message on my talk/chat page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages to help you. The left column contains tutorials and introductory pages while the right shows ways to help out Wikipedia.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Again, welcome! :) -- Hdt83 Chat 18:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)June 2010
Monday, June 28
[edit]Re: Theremin
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Theremin , please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Proposed merge of List of magical negro archetypes in fiction into Magical negro
[edit]Hi,
As you have recently edited one of the two articles mentioned, I am notifying you of the proposed merger. Please comment at Talk:Magical negro#Proposing a merger. Thank you, Bigger digger (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
San Jose, California
[edit]I thought I'd swing by and give some advice on how to source WP articles a little better. Find articles in newspapers, magazines, or websites (journals and other scholarly works are great too) that mention a topic. This would be in opposition to what happened on San Jose. You linked straight to the item being discussed. Much, much better to only use sources that talk about the topic. Not the topic talking about itself (which aren't really reliable sources after all). Hope I've made sense, Dawnseeker2000 02:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)