User talk:Kidsonthemoon

...

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsha Aghdasi (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arsha Aghdasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arsha Aghdasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I deleted Extra parts from article to avoid peacock terms and resubmit AFC request again. Kidsonthemoon (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HenryTemplo Kidsonthemoon (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant job, now, you need to demonstrate notability. Unfortunately, I cannot accurately judge the sources, as many of them are in Persian(?), so I can't judge the notability via the sources. Regardless, have a great day and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HenryTemploThanks a gain. I was added some English sources such as a video from CNN. I also added his IMDB profile with more than 50 films and his verified Instagram page. Kidsonthemoon (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that IMDb is not a reliable source (see WP:IMDB), and neither are self published sources, like Instagram pages. However, the CNN video is probably reliable. Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kidsonthemoon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsha Aghdasi (June 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TipsyElephant was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This page was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsha Aghdasi for not being notable. Even if the person has gained notability since then the draft violates what Wikipedia is WP:NOT for a number of reasons. For instance, the draft is clearly WP:PROMOTIONAL and includes extensive lists related to the person that violates WP:LINKFARM. Some of the prose has citation WP:OVERKILL while the lists have next to no sourcing. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TipsyElephant (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milad Nouri (Iranian television presenter) has been accepted

Milad Nouri (Iranian television presenter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 14:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain Thank you for reviewing this article. I think “Milad Nouri (Developer)” is a better title for this article because his main occupation is the developer. Could you please move this article to “Milad Nouri (Developer)”? Kidsonthemoon (talk) 21:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidsonthemoon - "Developer" is too generic. How about software developer? Or...?? Missvain (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain I think "(Programmer)" is better because it's shorter than "(Software Developer)". but if you think "Software Developer" is better, it's ok. Kidsonthemoon (talk) 22:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidsonthemoon It's not about what is shorter - it's about what they do. If he is a software developer or a computer programmer - which is it - and is that what he's more notable for or is he more notable as a television personality and then secondary as a developer/programmer? We want to describe what he is notable for in the disambiguation and "Developer" and "programmer" is too generic. Let me know. Missvain (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain He is more notable as computer programmer. Kidsonthemoon (talk) 22:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidsonthemoon - Great, moved it! Missvain (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain Thank you. Kidsonthemoon (talk) 23:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain I think you moved disambiguation page by mistake. KidsOnTheMoon (talk) 23:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidsonthemoon- Ugh, it's a day today...fixed. Sorry! Missvain (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain

unfortunately, the article was deleted as spam!

I think the article's subject is notable enough (according to references). I want to improve and re-write it to solve the problems to serve as encyclopedia articles.

The topic of the article is notable because it was on the front page of 2 newspapers in Iran (Shargh &...) just today (16 July). (link is here: one of 4 people on the left side).

he also has interviews with the Los angles times, Deutsche Welle, and many Iranian newspapers and news agencies and presents more than 100 episodes of a live Charkh talk show on Iran's national tv.

Could you please review undelete request for this article?

Thank you. KidsOnTheMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidsonthemoon- It's not a simple as me reviewing it. You actually have to request deletion reviews at Wikipedia:Deletion review. So please go there for folks to review it! Missvain (talk) 15:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]