User talk:Kimbamy

Nomination of Paolo Barnard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paolo Barnard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Barnard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Educationtemple (talk) 20:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Draft:Carmelo Pipitone

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Draft:Carmelo Pipitone, which you proposed for deletion. Drafts cannot be deleted using the WP:PROD process. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this draft should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the draft. You may review speedy deletion criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, and tag the page with any of those critera if any apply. You may also, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion; however, first please read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Before nominating a page for deletion to see the guidelines. Thanks!. TartarTorte 18:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Kimbamy (talk) 18:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmelo Pipitone (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carmelo Pipitone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 19:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I'll try to improve it. Kimbamy (talk) 06:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kimbamy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 19:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmelo Pipitone has been accepted

Carmelo Pipitone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 17:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Qcne! Kimbamy (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: O.R.k. has been accepted

O.R.k., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 15:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @ToadetteEdit Kimbamy (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kefaya (band) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kefaya (band), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think "Songlines Magazine" link is enough, isn't it ? Kimbamy (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

by the way, I added 2 more independent souces (financial times and bbc.co.uk) and submitted. Thank you. Kimbamy (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kefaya (band) has been accepted

Kefaya (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 22:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Mach61! Kimbamy (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]