User talk:Kitchikeesik
September 2015[edit]
Your addition to Tina Keeper has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
March 2017[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tina Keeper, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Tina Keeper[edit]
Please familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest rules.
You do not get any special right to control the article's content, tone, focus, format or sourcing; you do not get any special right to decide that you're somehow the only former politician in the history of politics for whom it's not important for the article to mention the names of your predecessor and successor in the political office you held; you do not get any special right to turn the article into your personal résumé instead of a properly written and properly referenced encyclopedia article.
If there's any information in the article that is objectively wrong, then you may post to the article's talk page to request a correction — we're perfectly happy to correct any errors as long as you show appropriate reliable sources to support the corrections. However, we are not going to remove accurate information just because you're not personally interested in having it there. If something is factually wrong, we'd be happy to correct it, but we are not going to disappear accurate information (like the election results templates or the predecessor= and successor= fields in the infobox) from the article just because you personally deem it not "relevant". Our rules decide what's relevant to the article and what isn't, not your own personal rules.
There's nothing in the article that reflects badly on you at all, so I'm not seeing why there's a problem here. But our job is not just to be your personal LinkedIn, by highlighting your current work while downplaying the past — it's to cover everything that's noteworthy about you, including both your film and television career and your time in politics, in an encyclopedic manner. Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Bearcat. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)