User talk:Kiviat

False accusation of vandalism

You just removed a batch of useful edits on Glenmere mansion with a claim of "vandalism". Please look at the edits which I actually did, and tell me what, if any, of them constitute "vandalism". It looks like you may be trying hard to keep in your "Frogs End Tavern" comment which I did not edit out but which, unsourced, is a violation of Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy. You may also wish to review the Wikipedia policy on vandalism; disputes over content are never vandalism. - Nat Gertler (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

While I appreciate your enthusiasm in editing hte Glenmere mansion piece, you continue to accuse users of vandalism for trying to shape the article. As per WP:VANDAL, "edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism". Please stop with the accusations, and let's all get on the article's Talk page and see if we can work out the problems with this article through discussion. - Nat Gertler (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Your repeated reversions on Glenmere mansion

You have repeatedly reverted away any edits that anyone else has been making to Glenmere mansion, including revoking garmmatical corrections, added wikifications, links to photographs of the site, and a WP:COI tag, without stating reasons for their removals or discussing those removals on the Talk page. If you are unwilling to be cooperative in the editing of this article, may I suggest that you write your own article for your own website; if you wish to continue bringing your obvious strong concern to editing the Wikipedia article, let me suggest that you review the WP:CONSENSUS policy and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. I hope you do, and bring your strong energies to working more appropriately in this collaborative environment! - Nat Gertler (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Kiviat, please see the result of WP:AN3#User:NatGertler reported by User:jstanierm (Result: Protected). You are warned to observe Wikipedia policies, including WP:Conflict of interest, WP:Biographies of living persons, and WP:Verifiability. Please pay attention to advice from experienced editors such as NatGertler. If you continue to revert the article after protection expires, without first getting consensus at Talk:Glenmere mansion, you may be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 06:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest situation

A Conflict of Interest case has been opened in regards to your Glenmere mansion edits. Go to Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Glenmere mansion for details. - Nat Gertler (talk) 07:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)