User talk:Kokenspun
Nomination of Militrex Kosova Defense for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militrex Kosova Defense until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Omphalographer (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Man I don’t have the smallest clue who they are! I am new in Wiki as a donator and I just want to add informations that have been developing last days, please check and then talk! Best regards Kokenspun (talk) 22:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Personhumanperson. An edit that you recently made to Visoki Dečani seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Personhumanperson (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Also, if you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at Vitomiricë you may be blocked from editing. Also using multiple IP accouts is considered WP:SockpuppetryTheonewithreason (talk) 04:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
- If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kokenspun (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Kokenspun (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC) - @Theonewithreason
- [1] Kokenspun (talk) 16:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)- The info displayed by user @Theonewithreason are not true, are not sourced and very poorly sourced by using the interviews of people without neutral point of view. As long as the info is not confirmed it can’t be displayed! I am going to request a block for the user aforementioned! Kokenspun (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Textbook battleground mentality. This area is designated as a contentious topic, as you were advised above, for exactly this reason. The article has a talk page to work this out rather than edit war. You have not used it. When the block is done, if you would like to continue editing in this topic area, you are strongly advised to open discussion on these issues. If you just go right back to what you were doing, you will be as the moth to the flame. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eron Lushaj. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 19:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, to be honest i don’t understand how to contribute in this investigation, but as user Kokenspun I can guarantee that I am not sockpuppet of Eron Lushaj. I would really appreciate that if you can help me with that. Kokenspun (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can reply at the link provided above. However, judging by your editing history, I'm inclined to not trust your assertion that you are not the same person who edited under other, now-blocked accounts. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll respect your opinion! Kokenspun (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can reply at the link provided above. However, judging by your editing history, I'm inclined to not trust your assertion that you are not the same person who edited under other, now-blocked accounts. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.