User talk:Kongchoong

June 2020

Hi Kongchoong! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Airbus A330 MRTT that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 23:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your recent editing history at Liancourt Rocks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kongchoong reported by User:Phoenix7777 (Result: ). Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Liancourt Rocks) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lioncourt Rocks

This is an extremely controversial subject, which has over a long period been subject to mass change against consensus by accounts based in Korea, and an organisation called VANK. Please read the talk page of the subject during your 24 hour ban to appraise yourself of the history behind this. Thank you. Britmax (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Liancourt Rocks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]