User talk:Kooolxcv

Welcome!

Hello, Kooolxcv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rajiv Gandhi Sports Complex, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MifterBot I ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your passion to stick to your own version of the contents and presentation of an article

Hello Kooolxcv,

Your passion to stick to your own version of the contents and presentation of the article on Rohtak is quite pronounced because you repeatedly undo revisions by others to ensure that the article stays as you want it.

Unfortunately, many of the claims made by you in the article are not correct. There is no EMU service between Rohtak and any other city as of September 2011. The EMU service runs only between Delhi and Shakurbasti stations on Delhi-Rohtak railway line. Therefore I removed your unsubstantiated claim ("Rohtak is connected to New Delhi by EMU Service") by adding an explanation. Yet you undid my revision twice and reinstated your wrong claim. If you care to check with Indian Railways, you will find that there is no EMU service as claimed by you.

Your another claim that "The developed areas of Rohtak are 70% surrounded by foliage" has not been substantiated. Therefore I placed a "disputed" tag on it. You have removed it twice without inserting any citation or providing substantial proof of your claim. You have twice reinstated a wrong claim “Asia's Largest Cloth Market with own Production” without any citation or proof. Anyone even remotely familiar with textiles industry and its distribution trade in India would immediately realize that your claim has no merit. Yet you persist with it without any evidence or citation.

These repeated reinstatements of your own version by you and deleting better edits of others amount to vandalism.

Rohtak is the only name of Rohtak city whether written in Roman script or Devanagari script or any other script (unlike Bombay that is known as Mumbai in Marathi and Bambai in Hindi). Yet you repeatedly undo revisions by others and claim that the same word written in Devanagari script is another name. Hindi is the only official language of Rohtak and Haryana state. Yet you repeatedly insert the name in another script in the first line of the main text of the article.

If you want to elaborate on improvements to national highways every km, edit the article on the relevant national highway. Do not clutter the article on Rohtak city with these details. You may also learn the difference between an expressway (that has access-control) and an Indian national highway (that does not have access-control) and that an Indian national highway, however wide, is not an expressway.

Your command over English language is not really great. (Example: “It doesn't Costs Arm and a Leg to Travel within the Neighborhoods because the City is free from Traffic congestion” and “The service of Buses is within 20 minutes” by which you mean that buses run at a frequency of less than twenty minutes and “It was the site of a forest of Rohitaka trees and hence its name became City” by which you mean that it was the site of a forest of Rohitaka trees and hence the city's name became Rohtak.) Yet you repeatedly reinstate your poorly-worded text to overwrite the better-worded text of other editors.

I hope you realize that you do not have a copyright on this article on Rohtak, howsoever passionate about Rohtak city you may be. Take care so that you are not banned for repeated vandalism.

Rao Ravindra (talk) 20:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Rao Ravindra[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajiv Gandhi Sports Complex

A tag has been placed on Rajiv Gandhi Sports Complex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kamkek (talk) 15:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned

Hello Kooolxcv,

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Rohtak, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, delete "Disputed" templates or other materials from the article on Rohtak, as you again did today despite warning, you may be blocked from editing.

Living in Rohtak does not give you a right to write whatever you please in poor English language, repeatedly make unsubstantiated claims, delete "disputed" tag without dispute resolution and prevent others from improving the article.

You cannot go on deleting "disputed" tag without dispute resolution. You cannot keep on making unsubstantiated claims without inviting blockage as an editor. You have again inserted the sentence: Rohtak Junction is connected to New Delhi by EMU Service (starting in November 2011). You cannot make (unsubstantiated) predictions as if you are God. Even if a service is going to start in November 2011, the first half of your sentence is untrue. You have again made many other unsubstantiated claims today. Please desist from such impudence.

Rao Ravindra (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rohtak

As per the previous warnings you have received from others, please will you take care when contributing to the Rohtak article, or indeed any other. I have reverted your recent changes as they were unsourced, poorly written, speculative etc. Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you need any guidance but I would strongly suggested that you take another read of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]