User talk:Kris162
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kris162, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Manway 04:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
[edit]Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to $h*! My Dad Says. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Manway 04:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bellarmine College Preparatory, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 03:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bellarmine College Preparatory. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Encyclopedia articles are meant to be a summary of what others have written about a given subject. The school has its own media to communicate what they want communicated John from Idegon (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
To John from Idegon: You are incorrect. The 2018-19 tuition had no sources at all, why don't you fix that instead? I added references from Bellarmine themselves regarding their tuition for 2019-20. Hey, someone else added in the tuition for 2020-21 with a source from Bellarmine themselves. You didn't fix it.
Innaccurate edit summary
[edit]Hey! Friendly heads up regarding this edit - while the edit itself was inaccurate (he is still serving for the next 14 days), you used the summary "Fixed spacing" which doesn't really describe the edit. Always make sure your edit summaries match the edit's changes. Thanks! Remagoxer (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
To Remagoxer (talk): Thanks for the friendly heads up! I'm not sure why you claim "Fixed spacing" doesn't really describe the edit because all I did was change "August 24 , 2021" to "August 24, 2021" which DOES fix the random space between "24" and the comma. Although I do now acknowledge that even then, "You don't include term end until it actually happens, until then he's the incumbent" (as pointed out by Volvlogia's edit after mine). Yet, I think the edit is accurate since August 24 IS 14 days after today (August 10). Just a friendly heads up, haha! :)
Inaccurate comma
[edit]Hello there ~ just letting you know i removed the comma you put into the Andy Kindler article as it was not correct. In the construction we have there a comma after the year is intrusive and wrong ~ there is no break (what a comma indicates) after the year. This confusion arises because when we use the full date (day and month and year) there is often a pair of commas separating off the year. Hope this helps. Happy days, LindsayHello 07:43, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)