User talk:Krocha12345

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tito xd 02:23, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I am glad I got your attention!! First of all, I apologize for any accidental removal of any wikipedia content.

However, I am absolutely upset that somebody has been removing and redirecting content that I have properly added to the William Rehnquist wikipedia article. Have you contacted that person about removing my added content?!?!? Do not come here and send me threatening messages when I am nothing but a proper contributor!

This is ridiculous! I don't understand why my Rehnquist article additions keep getting messed with!

I haven't been actively watching the Rehnquist article, but I did see you blanking its Talk page. That's not the way we do things here at Wikipedia. That's why I sent the warning. However, I'll look over your edits and see whether the content you've been adding should be added or not. But what I would recommend is asking on the article's talk page and making your case there. Titoxd 02:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I only see this edit under your user name. Unless you have a source, that's probably going to be deleted as an edit without a neutral point of view. I suggest you read this policy before you make your case, it might help you. Tito xd 02:40, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for looking at my edit of the Rehnquist article. Again, the talk page "blanking" was merely an accident. I was only trying to delete my own comments - which were not elicitng a response. However, regarding my additions of the Alan Dershowitz reference: The issue of the "goose stepping" and heil hitlering" is well documented and even referenced in the Alan Dershowitz article which is appended at the end of the article - I suggest you read it and inform whether you think it is still something that should not be added.

Simply because something has a negative point of view does not necessarily mean it should be excluded from an article. Thanks for your response Titoxd.

I know and understand. However, many editors are watching the Rehnquist article to identify and remove vandalism on the spot, simply because there's been waves of vandals that have been attacking the article, writing nonsense from "Rehnquist revived and he's now a zombie who caught his wife cheating with his son" to "Rehnquist is a Nazi". To be honest, I would have removed it too simply because it was unreferenced. If you decide to reintroduce the edit, I suggest adding the link you got it from between single square brackets after the sentence, so you get a link that looks like this [1]. Also, I recommend you sign your name by typing ~~~~ after your comments. It produces a link with is very helpful in communicating with you. Tito xd 01:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 18:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]