User talk:Kukini/Archive10

Reverting edits

Hi,

Some of the articles I was working on, the links have been changed back to what they were before, any chance you could change them back to the link I put in? I know you can make mulitple edits at once, so I don't have to go back and change them one by one. Also, I don't want to get flagged again for the changes I am making. Thanks. HeMan5 02:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Article changes & External links

Hi,

So is it okay if I go and make the edits to the ones that were changed? I will just put back in the link I had before, that is all. Also, regarding the external links issue, all I was doing was changing the 'L' to lowercase, as I was told that only the first letter is supposed to be capitalised, is that correct? Thanks for your help and quick replies! HeMan5 02:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

smile

Dakota has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Videolizzard Productions

Can we discuss the deletion of this article. I would really like to have it up and I know there are some people that feel the same(10-15 people). --Sargw 23:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Aussieknowitall 06:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to say thankyou for the information, it did help. I hope to hear from you soon.

User:Scenekidsareez

FYI, I replaced your 48 hour block with an indef block as a vandalism only acount. If you disagree, feel free to put your block back. JoshuaZ 05:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Liberalism!

Yes, it was an error. Was working on a Wikipedia for another language. I accidentally switched browser while editing. Could you add

[[ms:Liberalisme]]

into the page please? I don't want to be seen like I'm reverting it since I've already done too much edit. __earth ^(Talk) 06:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! __earth ^(Talk) 06:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your service to Wikipedia. Good job! Sharkface217 23:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

WRT User talk:TabascoMan77

I don't know how you give out welcomes, but welcoming nonexistant users seems a little helpless... ;). Thanx anyway. 68.39.174.238 06:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The relevant edit is here. 68.39.174.238 21:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocking IP Vandal 38.101.209.250

Thanks. That was getting exhausting. --Rrburke 02:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

November Esperanza Newsletter

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!) Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach. Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins. What's New? The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one! A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts. Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.

The last AC meeting (full log) The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived. There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia. The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested! In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias. A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted! Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello. Signed... Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, The Halo, Shreshth91 and HighwayCello 20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

WOW

Love your user page, pity I can't do the same with mine :S Radiant 07:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Survey Q

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere? reply here. Deadline is December 15. AstroBoy 02:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi again and any advice?

Hi Kukini! When I joined Wikipedia some two years ago (2!? where did that go?) you were very kind in helping me get started and sending a welcome message. I have edited here and there and it been a most enjoyable time - making great acquaintances along the way to get information into the public domain. However, I've recently hit a snag where another user keeps deleting a section and claiming plagiarism. Obviously it's not plagiarism (it's a 'firing offence' in my job and I know the issues inside out), yet the user seems to be quite keen to flame. I'm not quite sure what to do. One part of me thinks "forget it - just don't bother working on this page anymore" while another part of me thinks "surely there must be a better way". Anyway, if you go to the effect size page and see the discussion on "Aliens" (I'm not making this up, honestly) you'll see what I mean. If you don't have the time - no problem I just wasn't sure what to do. I hope you are well (I see from your pages that you've continued to make people feel welcome! Great work). Best Grant 13:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Tubezone, the propietor of an article

Hi, Kukini.

Sorry for asking your help again. I left for some weeks, to avoid an edition war, but the user Tubezone continues to act as a bully and propietor of Emiliano Zapata article. Maunus left, because he couldn´t answer arguments.

Thanks.

--Posmodern2000 00:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Arawak

You beat me to the revert. Good work! :-) --Ling.Nut 02:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Gentex Corporation

Hi! I'm the Corporation Communications Manager for Gentex Corporation, and I made a substantial addition to information about our company. I wanted to know more about adding linkins with Wikipedia and outside Wikipedia. How many would you recommend. I updated our posting so it is text rich with links to internal and external sources. Further, the content has been reviewed throughout our company, as well as our own in=house curator has reviewed for factual accuracy. Please advise as how you would like me to proceed. I got the content up, and added a logo. What do you suggest for images, etc. The images we can provide are either ours or already part of the public domain from the U.S. Department of Defense. I look forward to hearing from you shortly. Thanks! Cfabrizi 17:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Take a look at the website and your talk page. Kukini 19:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Happyisgay

User:68.52.206.175 has taken a sockpuppet off of User:Happyisgay. When I put the tag back on, the IP user spoke on my talk page claiming to be "dougholton" of which Happyisgay is a suspected user of. Since I don't want to assume bad faith by mistake, is there any way to figure this out? -WarthogDemon 02:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

On another note, he continues to revert and is now threatening to report me for allegedly defaming him. -WarthogDemon 03:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

You left this message on my talk page: Your edits leave other editors to presume that this may be a vandalism only account. Please change your approach. Kukini 03:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

What approach would you suggest? I plan to add information to The Record (Stockton) page, but I noticed the media links in some cities were inconsistent. I want to add a link to each city The Record covers, as all media are listed in some cities, and no media are listed in others. The point is education, not vandalism. Thanks for your guidance. Recordnet 04:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Dynamic IP

Hello I have dynamic IP from polish Neostrada. I speak very bad english and make only [[pl:interwiki]]. That's all. The same I make in cs:, ja: ........ or de:Wiki. Possible in 3 hours I will have a new IP. Clear my discission please. Best regards IP--83.11.187.112 16:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Article and vandalism

Hi, apparently you and a few other users are upset because I've been "spamming" users on their talk pages. I am attempting to gather intereviewees for an article on Wikipedia users. I am targeting users based on other programs they're involved in. I am not harrassing them in any way. I leave one message and then leave it at that. If they want to participate, they contact me (and several have) and if they don't, they don't. I see no reason for the instantaneous harsh attiude I've gotten, nor the removal of my requests from pages as you've been doing. Could you please either stop deleting the messages or help me find a more appropriate venue to seek people out? FFFearlesss 22:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay well the next logical question is HOW do I email people directly? The only communication tool I've found is the talk pages. I don't want to digress too much but I'm really quite taken aback by the backlash on this whole thing. I would think a group of people so committed to producing a collaborative of knowledge would ENCOURAGE getting the word out in a way such as this and would be eager to help rather than threatening blockage and everything. FFFearlesss 00:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you for the advice. I really do appreciate it. FFFearlesss 01:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Pepsi unblock

Hi - I agree completely about the removal of content from Baylor University (that is - I agree with you, it should stay), and the reason I unblocked was really because the removal of the {{test1}} seemed to be a mistake (WP:AGFing here!), and because warning removal can't lead to a block. If he vandalises again, Ill blcok again! Thanks -- Martinp23 22:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

It's just the impression I got, since {{wr}} and variants have been deleted, and I saw something, somewhere, earlier today :P. Sorry I can't be of more help (and I may well be wrong - I think I'm wikipedias newest admin, since this morning!). Thanks Martinp23 22:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Re Congrats

Thanks!! Martinp23 23:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

My last edit included a summary, and YOU deleted it! 67.188.1.224 01:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Arafat

Hello, check my history, i left some notes on others for arafat, we need to correct that, ok, are you an administrator? If so, i am looking for one reliable one for months now...also no need to leave me a note, that's not what will solve problems.I know my way around here. Also, DO NOT leave answers on my ip page, but here, ok. -Historian

This user should sign her/his posts on talk pages. Kukini 22:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

And you should learn how to reply, never mind, i will look for other administrator, i am not signing anything.

Such behavior will leave a user suspect to other users. Kukini 22:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your help

Thanks for your help on the Howard W. Mattson article. It earned a DYK today in Wikipedia. I greatly appreciated it. Chris 13:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in User Talk:NorCalD503. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. NoRCaLD503 04:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Now THIS is a rare one. A violator of 3rr who is blanking notices on his own user talk page warning an administrator who is helping him/her learn the rules and norms of wikipedia. Kukini 04:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I am aware of the norms of Wikipedia. I suggest you become familar with the law regarding defamation. NoRCaLD503 04:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

As you continue to revert warnings on your user page, you are clearly not aware of the rules and norms of wikipedia. I hope you don't choose to continue these choices, but instead choose to edit wikipedia itself. Kukini 04:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia is not a portal for defamation. I was deleting libelous and defamatory comments. You continue to edit the page to re-post such defamatory and libelous comments. NoRCaLD503 04:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Nothing of the following, taken from your user talk page...is libelous nor defamatory.Kukini 04:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

"Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Stanford University. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Do bear in mind that multiple editors at the Stanford article have deleted the information that you have added. This may be a sign that it is not up to snuff for inclusion in the article. You may want to think about discussing its inclusion at the talk page to see if some compromise can be worked out to include it. Additionally, it is probably useful to cite a source for the information, particularly on espn.com or something which discusses the rarity of the occurrence. —C.Fred (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I checked. Of the four people identifiable who removed the trivia, only one lists him/herself as a Stanford alum. (One Cornell, and I forget what the other one was. Myself, degrees from NC State, and the years I spent pre-transfer singing a fight song involving dropping a battle axe and the old farm were another matter entirely...but then, everybody knows that school's other song. :) ) —C.Fred (talk) 04:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)"

Well, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it. But I also retain the right to file suit contending otherwise. And unlike Wikipedia, you don't get to be the judge. NoRCaLD503 05:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Of course, this is wikipedia. Kukini 05:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Of course, a federal judge can ORDER Wikipedia to delete the page I want deleted for good cause shown. After Wikipedia has to hire expensive attorneys to litigate the case, of course. NoRCaLD503 05:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks, Daniel

No problem, just trying to help. It appears that the editor has come to their senses and made an archive for the warnings. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 05:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see [1]. --Daniel Olsen 05:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

My user page vandalism

Thanks for the revert, I didn't expect vandalism when I wasn't on RC Patrol so it's a good thing you were around to clean it up. Thanks a lot. :)James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 11:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Hamster

I'm gonna unblock him. I have a feeling that he acted in good faith... I'll block him if he makes a bad edit again. WhisperToMe 05:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Guitarhamster

My thoughts exactly, it's just constant vandalism and the warnings haven't had any affect in the slightest ShakingSpirit^talk 05:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

I would like to express my appreciation of the time you spent considering my successful RfA. Thankyou Gnangarra 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Romania

Banned user Mywayy or impersonator keep reverting to 2004 economic data. Please do something.--62.77.230.10 16:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

vandal at 67.82.113.116

You've dealt with this vandal before, I just threw a third warning to his IP address: [2] His latest vandalism was on NFL. I'd nominate him for a ban/block, but that's a little beyond my wikiskills. Thought I'd draw the continued misconduct to your attention, since your discretion/skill at dealing with these issues likely exceeds mine by far. Thanks, Thomas B 00:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Can You Blcok Kryptohater123

He's being a spammer you can find his user name in the Krypto The Superdog discussion section.Mr.Rachel 19:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Right-to-vanish

Kukini, can you help me out with the following:

• User talk:Wakemp
• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Right to Vanish and deletion of talk page

The user in question had requested his page deleted as per right-to-vanish back in early October, and I've gotten a lot of grief for trying argue that this is indeed allowed on Wikipedia.

Note that in the last few days, Centrx has also changed m:Right to vanish to remove the reference to having talk pages removed. Now, it says that only talk subpages can be deleted. --Stéphane Charette 21:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

RE:Willy Loman

Click the link above and you'll see why I delinked it in the article. You'll also see why my edit summary clearly reads "redirect page."216.165.38.230 07:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Yea. I had a username, but stopped using it. If I ever feel the need to do something an anon editor can't do, I sign in again. Otherwise I prefer my anonymity, and I only edit when I stumble across a glaring mistake while reading articles. I also like that being anonymous more or less exempts you from WP:CIVIL, or at least from the pussyfooting that is often assumed to be the meaning of wp:civil. I mean, the comment I made above would likely have resulted in at least a reminder to a registered user to be civil, but it rarely does to anons. oh well. take care.

Oh, and the lack of edit summaries is cause I'm lazy and its easier to just hit submit when I do little shit that is unlikely to be questioned when it's reviewed (like the edit you pointed to, who'll worry about me adding a wikilink to xbox360? i only use edit summaries when i do something that looks bad, like I did when i removed the willy loman wl.

216.165.38.230 07:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The Hyrbid

I see that you welcomed User:The_Hybrid/Dispute. User:The_Hybrid is an established user who made a subpage of his user pager for a dispute resolution he is overseeing. Cheers, Fermion 07:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

My bad...I fixed it...thanks. Kukini 07:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I thought it might have been a mistake of a bot! Fermion 07:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

vandalism?

Hi,

Based on the contents of User talk:206.48.0.60 it appears that you once blocked that user. You also seem to have reverted some earlier silliness by that person on Arawak.

I dunno if you noticed, but today he/she did some more silliness to that page and its talk page, then reverted his/her own edits on the article. The funkiness on the talk page is still there.

Is this considered vandalism? Seems to skate on the edge of the definition IMO.

--Ling.Nut 01:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Gorelman vandalism

Please do go ahead and block User:Gorelman. You might also protect Lumpkin for a while. Dicklyon 07:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Someone beat me to it. Kukini 07:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

open hostility is good

I think that expressing my true opinions on other people's talk pages is an effective method to actually prevent them from vandalizing because the next time they do, then you know, I'm gonna blast again. I know people frown upon it because it isn't very polite, but everyone's thinking the same thing. Honestly, if everyone in the world read that article and we took a poll to see how many people enjoyed it, the numbers would be overwhelming. I mean, I was indeed a vandal myself, and would have appreciated the constructive attacks that I so frequently hand out. So in reality, I'm doing them a favor. Think of it as accelerated reform. ps nice user page, very classyWi-king 08:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

My page

Can you please stop messing with my page? I think I am entitled to keep whatever I want there, am I not? That's a little too much abuse of power, if you ask me... Lenineleal 08:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Uh... why does it belong to the community, if it's "my" page?? And how exactly does the community profit by me keeping those warnings and loads of stuff you posted there cluttering it? I can't understand. It's nice that there are people here in Wikipedia as helpful as you in fighting vandalism, but sincerely, you're picking on me a bit too much. That could be even considered bullying. Please, go find something else to do and leave me alone. Lenineleal 08:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Follow Up ...

Hi there:

I would like to say "Hi" and let you know that I do appreciate your e-mail.

Thank you for being positive about my initial input to the Wikipedia sections.

I am looking forward to working with you and Wikipedia members and contributors.

I am glad that I have been able to find a place where I can contribute with my knowledge, experience and engineering e-material.

Thanks,

Gordan Engware 05:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)engware

Delete

• I didn't delete your messages, I'm trying to edit my talk page all the time. Pooter-the-clown 17:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, this is not true, as you deleted my notices more than once while adding your notice on the top of your talk page. Kukini 17:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

• Look, it's not my aim to blank my own page. I'm trying to edit it. Please leave my talk page alone, otherwise you make me confused. Pooter-the-clown 17:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Once again, to clarify you are not to "edit" your user talk page by deleting notices from administrators. This is seen as vandalism. Please move on to editing actual articles in wikipedia instead. Of course you can, and should respond to notices from administrators on your user talk page. Best, Kukini 18:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcomes

Yes, I never got welcomed properly and felt very heart warmed when I was so i do about a hundred every now and then. The template is cool. I see you have a nack for things. Please can you help me out with a userbox I tried creating, its on my userpage at the bottom, its the 'trying to quit smoking one', the image wont load!? Cheers! Chavatshimshon

User page

Oh, the prob is sorted out now, User:Booksworm helped me out, he's only 13! ...anways can I request that you comment on my remarks in the talk page of noahide laws, it would give my say some more standing, i think the article needs to be cleaned up and split up. Thanks. Chavatshimshon 01:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the Welcome. You sent it to me already on 21:46, 3 September 2006 however, I like to keep my Talk page simple and clean and therefore I intend to remove it. I hope it's OK with you. By the way, it is not OK to revert changes made by myself to my own Talk page, as you did originally. Please read the "user's own Talk page exception" Poeticbent 17:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices on talk pages, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here [3], under "When pages get too long." Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages is often interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. This can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. I would be happy to help you do just that if you ask me to. Best, Kukini 19:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Kukini, I appreciate you offer to help out with something I don't want. As stated clearly in Wikipedia Types of vandalism with regards to this matter: "The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where this policy does not itself prohibit the removal... of comments at the user's discretion."

I'd like to close this subject now by giving you my rationale for wanting to keep my Talk page clean of junk and stuff that is redundant. I found out months ago that the content of my Talk page is being picked up by Google as a quasi article which it is not. I do not want my Talk page to become resourced by search engines. Please respect my wish.

You can always access my Talk page history for your own inquisitive pleasure. It is not being picked up by the search engines.

Poeticbent 20:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. Poeticbent 20:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)