User talk:KuriwaObs

Welcome!

Hello, KuriwaObs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 02:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Red Director. I'll do my best and I hope I don't make too many mistakes. If I do, I hope you or someone pokes me and I'll do my best to fix it. Thanks again. KuriwaObs (talk) 02:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Occult (software) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TryKid was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only cites two sources, but is very well written and extensive which makes me think that it is undisclosed paid editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Occult (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Occult (software), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TryKid (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KuriwaObs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TryKid (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KuriwaObs (talk) 01:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Thank you TryKid for your review of the Occult (software) article. I have added 9 references. I don't know what you mean by "undisclosed paid editing" as I'm not getting paid a penny - AU$0.01 + gst. :-) KuriwaObs (talk) 01:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be related.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vchimpanzee, Are you asking if my help question about merging two (or three) occultation topic articles is related to my Occult (Software)? If so, then Yes, I suppose they are. Lunar Grazes is a type of astronomical observation, and Occult (Software) is used to predict and analyse the observations... If not, then I don't understand your question. Sorry.KuriwaObs (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking a question. I'm letting you know, in case you didn't read the Help Desk response, that there was one, and it appears to be related to the above information.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 14:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Occult (software) (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Basie was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although this seems very thorough, I don't think you've succeeded in demonstrating that the software is notable by Wikipedia's standards. It's not enough that articles or tertiary sources use the tool: there seems to be very little coverage on the tool itself in wider circulation. I understand that this can be frustrating when you've put a lot of work into an article, and I think it would probably make an excellent blog post or part of a manual... but I'm not certain it works on WP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Occult (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Occult (software), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Basie (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Occult (software) (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, this seems very good, but it does the sources do not focus on the software, just giving brief mentions but not significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Occult (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Occult (software), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Occult (software)

Hello, KuriwaObs. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Occult (software), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Occult (software)

Hello, KuriwaObs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Occult".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]